Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2024
Comparison of antibody responses of heterologous and homologous Covid-19 booster vaccination: an observational study.
Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Durability and Dynamics of Anti-S-RBD IgG Response in Healthcare Workers: A Comparative Analysis of Homologous and Heterologous SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Schedules in a 1-Year Serial Cross-Sectional Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Article
- Adherence to the Mediterranean diet, particularly olive oil intake, and metabolic health parameters are independently associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced IgG responses.Metabolism open · 2026Article
- Heterologous prime-boost vaccination drives stromal activation and adaptive immunity against SARS-CoV-2 variants.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Pakistan has been seriously affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, with numerous waves of infection. Using different vaccine and booster doses was a key component to control and combat this pandemic. This study aims to monitor the heterologous and homologous booster vaccination doses that generate immune responses in healthy adults after 9 months of vaccination. Methods: In this cross-sectional, observational study a total of 173 samples were collected. Participants from both genders (Male and Female) between the ages of 18 to 25 years were enrolled for the study. Participants who had booster shots of homologous Sinopharm BBIBP CorV and heterologous Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines were included only, with the use of a Roche Cobas-e601 analyzer, the antibody titers in the blood serum were quantified by the ECLIA method. IBM SPSS 22 was utilized for descriptive statistical analysis and P< 0.05 was considered significant. Results: In this study the IgG antibody levels were measured against the full length of receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) protein. The mean antibody titer in the Pfizer group was 9764 ± 10976 U/mL and 5762 ± 4302 U/mL in the Sinopharm group. The Mean IgG antibody levels of the Pfizer-vaccinated group were significantly higher than the Sinopharm-vaccinated group (P=0.000, each). Comparing the Sinopharm BBIBP CorV booster dosage to the Pfizer booster, Pfizer BNT162b2demonstrated a stronger immune response. However, there were no immunological gender-specific significant differences. The administration of a third dosage of Pfizer BNT162b2 after two doses of BBIBP CorV. Conclusion: The administration of a third dosage of Pfizer BNT162b2 after two doses of BBIBP-CorV is recommended to boost the humoral immune response in the general population while there was no gender-specific difference observed. More effectiveness can be attained by administering additional doses due to the antibody decay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.