Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606235›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Biomarkers of response to ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Fernando Rodríguez-Jorge, José Ignacio Fernández-Velasco, Noelia Villarrubia, Julia Gracia-Gil, Eva Fernández, Virginia Meca-Lallana, Carolina Díaz-Pérez, Susana Sainz de la Maza, Eva María Pacheco, Ana Quiroga and 31 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Prognostic value of neurofilament light chain protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein in multiple sclerosis subtypes and disease activity patterns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

Fernando Rodríguez-Jorge *Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
José Ignacio Fernández-Velasco *Immunology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Noelia VillarrubiaImmunology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Julia Gracia-GilNeurology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Eva FernándezNeurology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Virginia Meca-LallanaNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Carolina Díaz-PérezNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Susana Sainz de la MazaImmunology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Eva María PachecoNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Juan Ramon Jimenez, Huelva, Spain.
Ana QuirogaNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Gerona Doctor Josep Trueta, Gerona, Spain.
Lluis Ramió-TorrentàNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Gerona Doctor Josep Trueta, Gerona, Spain.
Sergio Martínez-YélamosNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura BauNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Enric MonrealNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Ana López-RealNeurology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario La Coruña, La Coruña, Spain.
Alexander Rodero-RomeroImmunology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Laura BorregaNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Santiago DíazNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Gran Canaria, Spain.
Pablo EguíaNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Gran Canaria, Spain.
Mercedes EspiñoImmunology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Luis Chico-GarcíaNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Javier BarreroNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio Granada, Granada, Spain.
María Luisa Martínez-GinésNeurology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
José Manuel García-DomínguezNeurology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
Soraya De la FuenteNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Irene MorenoNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Raquel Sainz-AmoNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
M Alba Mañé-MartínezNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Joan XXII, Tarragona, Spain.
Ana CamineroNeurology Department, Complejo Asistencial de Ávila, Ávila, Spain.
Fernando CastellanosNeurology Department, Hospital Virgen del Puerto, Cáceres, Spain.
Ana Gómez LópezNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Andrés Labiano-FontcubertaNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Lucía AyusoNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias, Madrid, Spain.
Rossana AbreuNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain.
Miguel Ángel HernándezNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain.
José Meca-LallanaNeurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Lorena Martín-AguilarNeurology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Alfonso Muriel GarcíaBiostatistics Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Jaime MasjuanNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Lucienne Costa-FrossardNeurology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Luisa María VillarImmunology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain the changes of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) values in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with ocrelizumab and their association with treatment response. Methods: Multicenter prospective study including 115 RRMS patients initiating ocrelizumab treatment between February 2020 and March 2022 followed during a year. Serum samples were collected at baseline and every 3 months to measure sNfL and sGFAP levels using single-molecule array (SIMOA) technology. Based on age and body mass index, sNfL values were standardized using z-score. NEDA (non-evidence of disease activity)-3 status was defined for patients free of disease activity after a year of follow-up. Inflammation (INFL) was considered when new relapses occurred during follow-up or new MRI lesions were found at 1-year exploration. PIRA (progression independent of relapse activity) was defined as disability progression occurring in the absence of relapses or new MRI activity. Results: After a year on ocrelizumab, 85 patients (73.9%) achieved NEDA-3. Thirty patients did not achieve NEDA: 20 (17.4%) because of INFL and 10 (8.7%) because of PIRA. Of INFL patients, 6 (30.0%) had relapses, and 17 (85.0%) had at least one new MRI lesion at the 12-month examination. At baseline, INFL patients had higher sNfL (p = 0.0003) and sGFAP (p = 0.03) than the NEDA-3 group. PIRA patients mostly exhibited low sNfL and heterogeneous sGFAP levels. After a year, NEDA-3 and INFL patients showed similar decreases in sNfL (p < 0.0001) and sGFAP (p < 0.0001 for NEDA-3 and p = 0.001 for INFL ones). However, the decrease occurred earlier in NEDA-3 patients. Accordingly, sNfL > 1.5 z-score 3 months after ocrelizumab initiation indicated a higher risk of inflammation (OR = 13.6; p < 0.0001). Decrease in sGFAP values occurred later in both groups, with significant reductions observed at 12 months for INFL and 6 and 12 months for NEDA-3. No significant changes in sNfL or sGFAP were observed in PIRA patients. Conclusion: Ocrelizumab induced normalization of sNfL and sGFAP in the majority of NEDA-3 and inflammatory patients but did not cause changes in the PIRA group. Our data suggest that normalization of sNfL and sGFAP is associated with the lack of inflammatory-associated disease progression but it may not affect non-inflammatory PIRA.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkersMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNeurofilament ProteinsAdultDisease ProgressionFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansImmunologic FactorsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkersGFAP protein, humanGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinImmunologic Factorsneurofilament protein LNeurofilament Proteinsocrelizumabglial fibrillary acidic proteinmultiple sclerosisneurofilament light chainocrelizumabserum biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39606235
PMCPMC11600310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.