Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606226›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Preclinical delayed toxicity studies of BCMA CAR T-cell injection in B-NDG mice with multiple myeloma.

Jianmin Guo, Qiqi Wu, Hongjian Li, Chun Liang, Jinlong Dai, Shuren Zhang, Cailing Dai, Jishuai Zhang, Yuying Wen, Wei Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jianmin Guo *Division of Life Science and State Key Lab of Molecular Neuroscience, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Qiqi Wu *Guangzhou Bay Area Institute of Biomedicine, Guangdong Lewwin Pharmaceutical Research Institute Co.,Ltd., Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Drug Non-Clinical Evaluation and Research, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Innovative Drug Evaluation and Research, Guangzhou, China.
Hongjian Li *Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Cellular and Genetic Therapy Innovative Drugs, Shenzhen, China.
Chun LiangDivision of Life Science and State Key Lab of Molecular Neuroscience, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jinlong DaiGuangzhou Bay Area Institute of Biomedicine, Guangdong Lewwin Pharmaceutical Research Institute Co.,Ltd., Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Drug Non-Clinical Evaluation and Research, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Innovative Drug Evaluation and Research, Guangzhou, China.
Shuren ZhangGuangzhou Bay Area Institute of Biomedicine, Guangdong Lewwin Pharmaceutical Research Institute Co.,Ltd., Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Drug Non-Clinical Evaluation and Research, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Innovative Drug Evaluation and Research, Guangzhou, China.
Cailing DaiGuangzhou Bay Area Institute of Biomedicine, Guangdong Lewwin Pharmaceutical Research Institute Co.,Ltd., Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Drug Non-Clinical Evaluation and Research, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Innovative Drug Evaluation and Research, Guangzhou, China.
Jishuai ZhangGuangzhou Bay Area Institute of Biomedicine, Guangdong Lewwin Pharmaceutical Research Institute Co.,Ltd., Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Drug Non-Clinical Evaluation and Research, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Innovative Drug Evaluation and Research, Guangzhou, China.
Yuying WenGuangzhou Bay Area Institute of Biomedicine, Guangdong Lewwin Pharmaceutical Research Institute Co.,Ltd., Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Drug Non-Clinical Evaluation and Research, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Innovative Drug Evaluation and Research, Guangzhou, China.
Wei YangDivision of Life Science and State Key Lab of Molecular Neuroscience, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Based on the efficacy data from the previous study of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell injection, we further examined the delayed toxicity for 8 weeks after a single dose of BCMA CAR T-cell injection to observe possible toxic reactions. Methods: B-NDG mice transplanted with multiple myeloma (MM) cells were given a single dose of BCMA CAR T-cell injection at two dosages or human normal T cells and then subjected to examinations including clinical signs, weight and food intake measurements, haematology, blood biochemical analysis, cytokine assay, T-lymphocyte subpopulation quantification and histopathology on days 28 and 56 after dosing. In addition, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to quantify DNA fragments in different tissues to assess the tissue distribution of CAR and provide a basis for its preclinical safety evaluation and clinical dosing. Results: In the delayed toxicity study, no mortality or significant toxic effects such as reductions in food intake, body weight, relevant biochemical parameters and target organ weights were observed in the BCMA CAR T-cell-treated groups. Compared to the model group, restorative changes in clinical signs and clinicopathology indicating therapeutic effects were seen in the BCMA CAR T-cell-treated groups. Human-derived cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4, IL-6, IL-12, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) could be detected in all cancer cell-bearing mice by cytokine level measurement. IFN-γ levels showed a geometric increase due to the graft versus host disease (GVHD) response induced in the mice, while the levels of the other cytokines did not show significant changes. Histopathological examination indicated that the BCMA CAR T-cell treatment groups showed mixed cellular infiltration of human-derived T cells, cancer cells, and inflammatory cells in several target organs including the liver, spleen, lung, and kidney, and some of them showed mild tissue damage, but the number of the animals and the severity of damage were significantly less than those of the T-cell control group as well as the model group. The results of the tissue distribution study showed that BCMA CAR T cells were mainly concentrated in the kidney, lung, bone marrow and the related immune organs/tissues, and the distribution of BCMA CAR T cells was highly consistent with that of MM cells, suggesting that BCMA CAR T cells could follow the cancer cells during metastatic targeting of the tissues. Conclusions: The present study demonstrated a low toxicity of BCMA CAR T-cell injection, with manageable side effects and good anticancer activity and without observable adverse effects. This study provides data to support future clinical studies of BCMA CAR T-cell injection for MM.

Indexed as

B-Cell Maturation AntigenImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMultiple MyelomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsCell Line, TumorCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMiceT-LymphocytesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysB-Cell Maturation AntigenCytokinesReceptors, Chimeric AntigenTNFRSF17 protein, humanB-cell maturation antigenchimeric antigen receptor T cellscytokinesdelayed toxicityimmunotherapymultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID39606226
PMCPMC11598525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.