ArticleThe Ulster medical journal2024
A Ten Year Review Of Management And Outcomes Of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in The Ulster medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are a heterogeneous group of rare tumours that require complex surgical management with outcomes tightly correlated to quality of surgery.This study aimed to examine the determine patient demographics, treatment approaches and outcomes for patients with primary RPS in this single center during the period 2010-2021. Methods: All patients diagnosed with RPS from 2010 to 2021 that underwent surgical resection in a single trust in Northern Ireland were identified. Data was collated using histopathology records, electronic care records and retrospective chart review. Results: Fifty-four resections were performed for RPS in a 10 year period. 30 day mortality rate was 3.7%, in-hospital mortality was 1.9% and 90 day mortality was 7.4%. 11.1% of patients were recorded as having a severe postoperative adverse event. 90.4% patients achieved an R0/R1 resection. The 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival were 80% [95% confidence interval (CI) 67-89), 69% (95% CI 53-79), and 62% (95% CI 48-75). The 1 and 5-year crude-cumulative-incidence (CCI) for local recurrence were 32% (95%CI 20, 46) and 55% (95%CI 32,77). 1 and 5-year CCI for distant metastases were 11% (95%CI 4, 23) and 35% (95%CI 15,59). Median overall survival was 6.3 years (IQR 5.0-7.6). Conclusion: Survival outcomes in this LVH are similar to those reported by a number of HVHs worldwide, with an additional low rate of severe postoperative complication. Given that there are only between 250 and 300 new diagnoses of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in the UK each year prospective data collection and participation in multi-institution studies, specifically a UK collaboration, is critical to expand upon current knowledge and further improve management, outcomes and follow-up of patients with this rare and complex surgical disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39606142PMC11591214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.