ArticleCureus2024
Enhancing Precision in Rectal Cancer Care: Unravelling the Correlation Between MRI Locoregional Staging and Prognostic Factors, With Post-resection Pathology.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as a pivotal tool in the preoperative assessment of rectal cancer. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative MRI pelvis in rectal cancer for locoregional staging, circumferential margin (CRM+), and vascular invasion (V1) with postoperative histopathological findings. Methods All patients who underwent preoperative staging MRI pelvis scanning for histology-proven primary rectal adenocarcinoma between January 2020 and July 2022 were included in this study. Preoperative MRI assessment data, including tumor (T), nodal (N) staging, and other prognostic factors, including circumferential margin and vascular invasion, were compared with histopathological reports. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy were calculated. Agreement between MRI and pathology reports was evaluated using the weighted kappa statistic. Results The study included 143 patients. The accuracy of MRI is at its peak for T0 and T4 tumors (T0-97.9%, T4-93.37). The weighted kappa statistic for T staging is 0.401, and for N staging, it is 0.286. The standard kappa statistic for extramural vascular invasion (V) and circumferential resection margin (CRM) is 0.269 and 0.225, respectively. Conclusion MRI demonstrates fair agreement with pathology regarding T and N staging and exhibits high specificity for CRM and V1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.