ReviewFrontiers in genetics2024
What are microsatellites and how to choose the best tool: a user-friendly review of SSR and 74 SSR mining tools.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pan-SSR architecture in Acrossocheilus fasciatus links cross-assembly repeat conservation, repeat-unit count variation, and genomic context.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Article
- Genomic distribution characteristics and interspecific differences of microsatellite landscapes in Felidae.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Microsatellite-based genetic diversity assessment of Donggala cattleVeterinary world · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Whole-Genome Survey and Analysis of the Naozhou Stock of Large Yellow Croakers (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Population Structure and Genetic Diversity Among Shagya Arabian Horse Genealogical Lineages in Bulgaria Based on Microsatellite Genotyping.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Development and Characterization of New SSR Markers inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genetic Diversity and Conservation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microsatellites, also known as SSR or STR, are essential molecular markers in genomic research, playing crucial roles in genetic mapping, population genetics, and evolutionary studies. Their applications range from plant breeding to forensics, highlighting their diverse utility across disciplines. Despite their widespread use, traditional methods for SSR analysis are often laborious and time-consuming, requiring significant resources and expertise. To address these challenges, a variety of computational tools for SSR analysis have been developed, offering faster and more efficient alternatives to traditional methods. However, selecting the most appropriate tool can be daunting due to rapid technological advancements and the sheer number of options available. This study presents a comprehensive review and analysis of 74 SSR tools, aiming to provide researchers with a valuable resource for SSR analysis tool selection. The methodology employed includes thorough literature reviews, detailed tool comparisons, and in-depth analyses of tool functionality. By compiling and analyzing these tools, this study not only advances the field of genomic research but also contributes to the broader scientific community by facilitating informed decision-making in the selection of SSR analysis tools. Researchers seeking to understand SSRs and select the most appropriate tools for their projects will benefit from this comprehensive guide. Overall, this study enhances our understanding of SSR analysis tools, paving the way for more efficient and effective SSR research in various fields of study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.