ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2024
An historical overview of artificial intelligence for diagnosis of major depressive disorder.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Performance of Wearable Device-Based Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Multimodal observable cues in mood, anxiety, and borderline personality disorders: a review of reviews to inform explainable AI in mental health.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Optimization of potential targets for antidepressant Chinese medicines: AI and multi-omics methods.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Digital psychiatry: concepts, framework, and implications.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
- Predicting depression among men who have sex with men in Ghana using machine learning algorithms.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology holds immense potential in the realm of automated diagnosis for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), yet it is not without potential shortcomings. This paper systematically reviews the research progresses of integrating AI technology with depression diagnosis and provides a comprehensive analysis of existing research findings. In this context, we observe that the knowledge-driven first-generation of depression diagnosis methods could only address deterministic issues in structured information, with the selection of depression-related features directly influencing identification outcomes. The data-driven second-generation of depression diagnosis methods achieved automatic learning of features but required substantial high-quality clinical data, and the results were often obtained solely from the black-box models which lack sufficient explainability. In an effort to overcome the limitations of the preceding approaches, the third-generation of depression diagnosis methods combined the strengths of knowledge-driven and data-driven approaches. Through the fusion of information, the diagnostic accuracy is greatly enhanced, but the interpretability remains relatively weak. In order to enhance interpretability and introduce diagnostic criteria, this paper offers a new approach using Large Language Models (LLMs) as AI agents for assisting the depression diagnosis. Finally, we also discuss the potential advantages and challenges associated with this approach. This newly proposed innovative approach has the potential to offer new perspectives and solutions in the diagnosis of depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.