Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39605998›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Instruments for assessing social health in the context of cognitive decline and dementia: a systematic review.

Janissa Altona, Henrik Wiegelmann, Marta Lenart-Bulga, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, Eline Verspoor, Imke Seifert, Julia Misonow, Dorota Szcześniak, Joanna Rymaszewska, Rabih Chattat and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Janissa AltonaDepartment of Nursing Science Research, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Henrik WiegelmannDepartment of Nursing Science Research, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Marta Lenart-BulgaDepartment of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Myrra Vernooij-DassenInstitute for Health Sciences Radboud, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Eline VerspoorInstitute for Health Sciences Radboud, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Imke SeifertDepartment of Nursing Science Research, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Julia MisonowDepartment of Nursing Science Research, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Dorota SzcześniakDepartment of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Joanna RymaszewskaDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
Rabih ChattatDepartment of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Yun-Hee JeonSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Esme Moniz-CookFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Martina RoesGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases e. V. (DZNE), site Witten, Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Marieke PerryInstitute for Health Sciences Radboud, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Karin Wolf-OstermannDepartment of Nursing Science Research, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of social health has recently received increasing attention in dementia research. Various notions of what social health is and how it can be measured are circulating. They may pose challenges for comparing results and interpreting them for the development of interventions. This systematic review aims to classify existing instruments that measure various domains of social health. To achieve this, we applied a new multidimensional framework consisting of six key domains of social health. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL were searched for studies published between January 2000 and July 2023. A total of 227 studies (longitudinal, case-control, and cross-sectional cohort studies) with 102 single instruments were included. The search terms were as follows: (1) dementia (i.e., Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment); (2) social health markers (i.e., decision-making, social participation, loneliness); and (3) instruments (i.e., tools, measures). The instruments are mainly self-reported, and the number of items ranges from 3 to 126. Despite the wide array of instruments available, most focus on individual domains of social health. We recommend the development of more conceptually robust instruments that can comprehensively evaluate psychosocial interventions and adequately capture all domains of social health.

Indexed as

cognitive declinedementiameasuressocial factorssocial health

Identifiers

PMID39605998
PMCPMC11599264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.