Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39605955›Full record

ArticleSynthetic biology (Oxford, England)2024

Stijn T de Vries, Tania S Köbel, Ahmet Sanal, Daniel Schindler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Synthetic biology (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stijn T de VriesMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 10, Marburg 35043, Germany.
Tania S KöbelMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 10, Marburg 35043, Germany.
Ahmet SanalMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 10, Marburg 35043, Germany.
Daniel SchindlerMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 10, Marburg 35043, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7423-6540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Golden Gate cloning has become one of the most important DNA assembly strategies. The construction of standardized and reusable part libraries, their assembly into transcription units, and the subsequent assembly of multigene constructs is highly reliable and sustainable. Researchers can quickly construct derivatives of their assemblies or entire pathways, and importantly, the standardization of Golden Gate assemblies is compatible with laboratory automation. Most Golden Gate strategies rely on 4-nt overhangs generated by commonly used Type IIS enzymes. However, reduction to 3-nt overhangs allows the use of codons as fusion sites and reduces potential scar sequences. This is particularly important when studying biological functions, as additional nucleotides may alter the structure or stability of the transcribed RNA. To address this issue we use SapI, a Type IIS enzyme generating three nucleotide overhangs, for transcription unit assembly, allowing for codon-based fusion in coding sequences. We created a corresponding plasmid toolbox for basic part generation and transcription unit assembly, a workflow we term as

Indexed as

DNA assemblyGolden Gate cloningModular CloningSapIsynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID39605955
PMCPMC11602030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.