ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2024
Contrastive learning for neural fingerprinting from limited neuroimaging data.
Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal contrastive learning on rs-fMRI to quantify whole-brain network recovery after hypothalamic hamartoma surgery.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neural fingerprinting is a technique used to identify individuals based on their unique brain activity patterns. While deep learning techniques have been demonstrated to outperform traditional correlation-based methods, they often require retraining to accommodate new subjects. Furthermore, the limited availability of samples in neuroscience research can impede the quick adoption of deep learning methods, presenting a challenge for their broader application in neural fingerprinting. Methods: This study addresses these challenges by using contrastive learning to eliminate the need for retraining with new subjects and developing a data augmentation methodology to enhance model robustness in limited sample size conditions. We utilized the LEMON dataset, comprising 3 Tesla MRI and resting-state fMRI scans from 138 subjects, to compute functional connectivity as a baseline for fingerprinting performance based on correlation metrics. We adapted a recent deep learning model by incorporating data augmentation with short random temporal segments for training and reformulated the fingerprinting task as a contrastive problem, comparing the efficacy of contrastive triplet loss against conventional cross-entropy loss. Results: The results of this study confirm that deep learning methods can significantly improve fingerprinting performance over correlation-based methods, achieving an accuracy of about 98% in identifying a single subject out of 138 subjects utilizing 39 different functional connectivity profiles. Discussion: The contrastive method showed added value in the "leave subject out" scenario, demonstrating flexibility comparable to correlation-based methods and robustness across different data sizes. These findings suggest that contrastive learning and data augmentation offer a scalable solution for neural fingerprinting, even with limited sample sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.