ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Natural products: promising therapeutics for targeting regulatory immune cells in the tumor microenvironment.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting regulatory T cells in the prostate cancer microenvironment: From mechanisms to therapeutics (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Review
- Natural Products as Nutritional Supplements in Human Disease Prevention and Management: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Natural Products as Promising Pharmacological Agents Against Cancer: A Holistic Overview of Their Anti-Cancer Mechanisms of Action of the Last Five Years.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Explainable machine-learning prediction of overall and cancer-specific survival in adult triple-negative breast cancer using SEER: a comparative study of nomograms and random survival forests.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Flavonoids as Inhibitors of VEGFR2 Signaling: Structural Insights for the Development of Safer Anti-Angiogenic Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Natural Products in Cancer Prevention and Therapy: Current Challenges and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
- Identification of Key Bioactive Compounds of Medicine-Food Homologous Substances and Their Multi-Target Intervention Effects in Osteosarcoma Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Antitumor effect of alcohol extract ofFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Immunomodulatory Natural Products in Cancer Organoid-Immune Co-Cultures: Bridging the Research Gap for Precision Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regulatory immune cells regulate immune responses through various mechanisms, affecting the occurrence, development, and therapeutic effects of tumors. In this article, we reviewed the important roles of regulatory immune cells, such as regulatory T cells (Tregs), regulatory B cells (Bregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), regulatory dendritic cells (DCregs), and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), in the tumor microenvironment (TME). The immunomodulatory effects of natural products, such as polysaccharides, polyphenols, glycosides, alkaloids, terpenoids, quinones, and other compounds, which affect the functions of regulatory immune cells through molecular signaling pathways, thereby enhancing the potential of the antitumor immune response, are discussed. These findings provide new ideas and possibilities for the application of natural products in tumor treatment, which can help enhance the effectiveness of tumor treatment and improve patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.