ReviewJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2024
Next-Generation Sequencing: An Advanced Diagnostic Tool for Detection of Pancreatic Disease/Disorder.
Review in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing on Surgical Decision-Making in Branch-Duct IPMN.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pancreas is involved in digestion and glucose regulation in the human body. Given the recognized link between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, addressing pancreatic disorders and pancreatic cancer is particularly challenging. This review aims to highlight the limitations of traditional methods in diagnosing pancreatic disorders and cancer and explore several next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches as a promising alternative. There are distinct clinical symptoms that are shared by a number of clinical phenotypes of pancreatic illness induced by particular genetic mutations. Traditional diagnostic methods encompass computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, transabdominal ultrasound, laparoscopy, and positron emission tomography have a prognostic ability of only 5% or less and a 5-year survival rate. Genetic sequencing can be employed as an alternative to conventional diagnostic techniques. Sanger sequencing and NGS are currently largely operated genome analysis, with no exception for pancreatic disease diagnosis. The NGS methods can sequence millions to billions of short DNA fragments, enabling enormous sample screening in a short amount of time with low-abundance detection, like in 0.1%-1% mutation prevalence declining approximate cost. Whole-genome sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and single-cell NGS are a few NGS methods utilized to diagnose pancreatic disease. For both research and clinical applications, the NGS techniques can provide a precise diagnosis of pancreatic disorders in a short amount of time at a reasonable expenditure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.