ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2024
Endoscopic Full-Thickness Plication for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Sham Controlled Trials.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects approximately 20% of adults in the United States. Proton pump inhibitors are the first-line treatment but are associated with long-term side effects. Endoscopic full-thickness plication (EFTP) is a minimally invasive alternative that improves the valvular mechanism of the gastroesophageal junction. This meta-analysis compared EFTP to a sham procedure for the treatment of refractory GERD. Materials and Methods: This meta-analysis followed the Cochrane guidelines and PRISMA standards and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023485506). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library through December 2023. Inclusion criteria targeted Randomized controlled trials comparing EFTP with sham procedures for GERD were included. Statistical analyses utilized RevMan with a random-effects model, and the results were considered significant at Results: Of the 2144 screened studies, three RCTs with 272 patients with GERD were included: 136 patients underwent EFTP and 136 underwent sham procedures. Primary outcomes showed a significant reduction in PPI usage (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.35-0.73; Conclusions: EFTP significantly reduced PPI usage, improved GERD-HRQL scores, and decreased total reflux episodes compared with sham procedures, highlighting its potential as a minimally invasive treatment. Further research is needed to compare EFTP with other minimally invasive techniques to determine the most effective treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.