Comparison of multiple machine learning models for predicting prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on contrast-enhanced CT radiomics and clinical features.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic potential of combining clinical features and radiomics with multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: A total of 116 patients with PDAC who met the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to a training or validation cohort. Seven ML algorithms, including Supervised Principal Components, stepwise Cox, Random Survival Forest, CoxBoost, Least absolute shrinkage and selection operation (Lasso), Ridge, and Elastic network, were integrated into 43 algorithm combinations. Forty-three radiomics models were constructed separately using radiomics features extracted from arterial phase (AP), venous phase (VP), and combined arterial and venous phase (AP+VP) images. The concordance index (C-index) of each model was calculated. The model with the highest mean C-index was identified as the best model for calculating the radiomics score (Radscore). Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to identify independent prognostic indicators and create a clinical model for prognosis prediction. The multivariable Cox regression was used to combine Radscore with clinical features to create a combined model. The efficacy of the model was evaluated using the C-index, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The model based on the Lasso+StepCox[both] algorithm constructed using AP+VP radiomics features showed the best predictive ability among the 114 radiomics models. The C-indices of the model in the training and validation cohorts were 0.742 and 0.722, respectively. Based on the results of the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, sex, Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage, and systemic inflammation response index were included to build the clinical model. The combined model, incorporating three clinical factors and AP+VP-Radscore, achieved the highest C-indices of 0.764 and 0.746 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. In terms of preoperative prognosis prediction for PDAC, the calibration curve and DCA showed that the combined model had a good consistency and greatest net benefit. Conclusion: A combined model of clinical features and AP+VP-Radscore screened using multiple ML algorithms has an excellent ability to predict the prognosis of PDAC and may provide a noninvasive and effective method for clinical decision-making.