Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39605877›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Handy insights: Could online patient-reported outcome measures be used to assess hand injury rehabilitation?

Sten Kajitani, Nicole Liddy, David Harms, Keston Kajitani, Jason Kelly

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sten KajitaniUniversity College Cork, College Rd, University College, Cork, T12 K8AF.
Nicole LiddyJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
David HarmsUniversity of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Keston KajitaniArizona State University, 1151 S Forest Ave, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Jason KellyUniversity College Cork, College Rd, University College, Cork, T12 K8AF.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This protocol explores the use of online patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess recovery following hand trauma surgery. Hand injuries significantly impact patients' functional abilities and quality of life, making PROMs crucial for tracking recovery and guiding rehabilitation. This study leverages online versions of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) and Hand Injury Severity Score (HISS) to assess patient perceptions of their recovery over time. Our prospective cohort study involves 250 participants who will complete these PROMs at four intervals post-surgery. We aim to understand how demographic factors such as age, gender, and injury severity influence recovery perceptions and outcomes. This research seeks to enhance patient care by identifying factors that influence postoperative outcomes and by tailoring rehabilitation strategies accordingly.•

Indexed as

Hand Injury severity scoreHand surgeryHandy Insights: Could Online Patient-Reported Outcome Measures be used to Assess Hand Injury Rehabilitation?Michigan hand outcomes questionnairePatient-reported outcome measuresRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39605877
PMCPMC11600655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.