Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39605816›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Simulation-based driver scoring and profiling system.

Jelena Medarević, Sašo Tomažič, Jaka Sodnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jelena MedarevićFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Sašo TomažičFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jaka SodnikFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes a rule-based Driver Scoring System model, derived from behavioral data collected using a driving simulator. It introduces a novel approach to establish driver profiles through feature engineering of acquired dataset, with features evaluating various aspects of driver behavior. The research aims to provide employers and drivers with profile-specific feedback and recommendations to design training protocols. Principal Component Analysis is applied on preprocessed dataset from 412 drivers for dimensionality reduction and feature selection. The K-means clustering algorithm is used for data analysis, resulting in three distinct clusters. The Kruskal-Wallis test, supplemented by post hoc Dunn testing is employed to determine statistical significance between clusters. Clusters are portrayed using descriptive statistics, specifically the mean scores and overall driver performance averages. Our method delineates three driver profiles, with two driving styles reflecting desirable driving skills and good overall performance, while the third represents unacceptable driving skills and bad overall performance.

Indexed as

Clustering analysisData analysisDriver behaviorDriver profilesRoad safetyScoring system

Identifiers

PMID39605816
PMCPMC11600037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.