ArticleHeliyon2024
Impact of artificial intelligence adoption on students' academic performance in open and distance learning: A systematic literature review.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing anesthesia monitoring training: a SPOC and Gagné's model hybrid personalized by artificial intelligence.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Article
- Machine learning-based academic performance prediction with explainability for enhanced decision-making in educational institutions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating the use of AI in the design of learning situations by university students of early childhood education.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Advancing educational equity in rural China: the impact of AI devices on teaching quality and learning outcomes for sustainable development.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has been extensively studied, focusing on its ability to enhance learning and teaching processes. However, the precise impact of AI adoption on academic performance in open and distance learning (ODL) remains largely unexplored. This systematic literature review critically evaluates AI's impact on academic performance within ODL environments. Drawing from a curated selection of 64 papers from an initial pool of 700, spanning from 2017 to 2023 and sourced from Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, this study delves into the multifaceted role of AI in enhancing learning outcomes. The meta-analysis reveals a diverse methodological landscape: machine learning methods, employed in 29.69 % of the studies, stand out for their ability to predict academic achievement, which is matched in prevalence by classical statistical methods. Although less common at 3.13 %, hybrid methods are a burgeoning area of research, while a significant 40.63 % of works prioritise nonempirical methods, focusing on theoretical analysis and literature reviews. This investigation highlights the critical factors driving AI adoption in education and its tangible benefits for student performance. It identifies a crucial literature gap: the absence of a process-based framework designed to forecast AI's educational impacts with greater precision, especially across gender and regional lines. By proposing this framework, this study contributes to the academic discourse on AI in education. It underscores the urgent need for structured methodologies to navigate the challenges and opportunities of AI integration. This framework, aligned with UNESCO's 2030 educational objectives, promises to bridge educational divides, ensuring equitable access to quality education across diverse demographics. The findings advocate for future research to design, refine, and test such a framework, paving the way for more inclusive and effective educational technologies in ODL settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.