Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39605807›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Unlocking the circular potential: A review and research agenda for remanufacturing in the European wood products industry.

Mirka Kans, Malin Löfving

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mirka KansDepartment of Technology Management and Economics, Division of Supply and Operations Management, Chalmers University of Technology, Vera Sandbergs Allé 8, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Malin LöfvingSchool of Engineering, Department of Product, Production and Design, Jönköping University, Box 1026, 551 11, Jönköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While circularity has gained significant attention in recent years, the wood products industry remains an understudied sector in terms of remanufacturing practices. This study addresses this research gap by synthesizing the existing research on remanufacturing in the wood products industry and developing a research agenda tailored to the European context based on a structured literature review. Content and thematic analyses of peer-reviewed publications founded the basis of the synthesis. Three distinct perspectives on remanufacturing in the wood products industry emerged from the analysis: systems, customer, and manufacturer. These perspectives provide a framework for understanding the complex dynamics of remanufacturing in this sector. The proposed research agenda for the European context is intended to stimulate and guide future research efforts. A central priority identified is the need for enhanced collaboration and communication among actors within the value chain. Additionally, the importance of gaining a deeper understanding of customer perceptions and behavior in the context of remanufactured wood products is recognized. The development of economically viable remanufacturing strategies is another key focus. This knowledge is crucial for tailoring products to meet consumer needs and preferences, ultimately driving demand for remanufactured items. In conclusion, remanufacturing in the wood products industry is an area ripe for exploration, and this study represents a critical step towards catalyzing the research efforts necessary for its advancement.

Indexed as

Circular strategiesEuropeLiterature reviewRemanufacturingResearch agendaWood products industry

Identifiers

PMID39605807
PMCPMC11600031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.