ArticleJournal of pain research2024
Real-Time Ultrasound-Guided CT-Monitored Percutaneous Cervical Disc Injection: An Emerging Approach for Accurate Diagnosis of Cervical Discogenic Diseases.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the preliminary application value of real-time ultrasound-guided combined with CT monitoring in percutaneous cervical disc puncture injection for diagnostic trials. Methods: Sixty patients with suspected cervical discogenic dizziness undergoing percutaneous cervical disc puncture between January 2023 and February 2024 were randomly divided into two groups: real-time ultrasound-guided combined with CT monitoring and CT-guided alone. The groups were compared for pre-puncture positioning time, total puncture process time, number of CT exposures, and complications. Subsequent treatment and medications were consistent between the two groups. Results: Sixty patients were divided into the the real-time US-guided combined with CT monitoring group (n=30) and the CT-guided group (n=30). Pre-puncture positioning time in the real-time US-guided combined with CT monitoring group was shorter than that in the CT-guided group, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The total puncture process time and the number of CT exposures in the real-time US-guided combined with CT monitoring group were smaller than those in the CT-guided group, and there was a statistical difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Two cases of hematoma appeared in CT guidance alone, and no hematoma appeared in the real-time US-guided combined with CT monitoring group. Conclusion: Real-time ultrasound-guided combined with computed tomography monitoring in percutaneous cervical disc puncture is a rapid, visible, safe, and effective method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.