ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
Brain functional connectivity under teleoperation latency: a fNIRS study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Safety of Cross-Regional 5G-Enabled Remote Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Case Series of 21 Patients.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- Semantic-Augmented Surgeon Cognitive Modeling for Surgical Flow Disruptions.The Hamlyn Symposium on Medical Robotics : proceedings · 2026Article
- Cortical mapping of real-time ultrasound-imaging visual feedback for ankle dorsiflexion in patients after stroke: a fNIRS study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Prefrontal fNIRS hemodynamic correlates of attentional load during rapid serial visual presentation tasks.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- A Virtual Reality Force Control Training System on Brain Activation: Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study.JMIR serious games · 2025Article
- Performance metrics outperform physiological indicators in robotic teleoperation workload assessment.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Long-distance robot teleoperation faces high latencies that pose cognitive challenges to human operators. Latency between command, execution, and feedback in teleoperation can impair performance and affect operators' mental state. The neural underpinnings of these effects are not well understood. Methods: This study aims to understand the cognitive impact of latency in teleoperation and the related mitigation methods, using functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) to analyze functional connectivity. A human subject experiment ( Results: The presence of latency in teleoperation significantly increased functional connectivity within and between prefrontal and motor cortexes. Maintaining visual latency while providing real-time haptic feedback reduced the average functional connectivity in all cortical networks and showed a significantly different connectivity ratio within prefrontal and motor cortical networks. The performance results showed the worst performance in the all-delayed condition and best performance in no latency condition, which echoes the neural activity patterns. Conclusion: The study provides neurological evidence that latency in teleoperation increases cognitive load, anxiety, and challenges in motion planning and control. Real-time haptic feedback, however, positively influences neural pathways related to cognition, decision-making, and sensorimotor processes. This research can inform the design of ergonomic teleoperation systems that mitigate the effects of latency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.