Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39605789›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Synchronized stepwise control of firing and learning thresholds in a spiking randomly connected neural network toward hardware implementation.

Kumiko Nomura, Yoshifumi Nishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kumiko Nomura *Frontier Research Laboratory, Corporate Research and Development Center, Toshiba Corporation, Kawasaki, Japan.
Yoshifumi Nishi *Frontier Research Laboratory, Corporate Research and Development Center, Toshiba Corporation, Kawasaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiking randomly connected neural network (RNN) hardware is promising as ultimately low power devices for temporal data processing at the edge. Although the potential of RNNs for temporal data processing has been demonstrated, randomness of the network architecture often causes performance degradation. To mitigate such degradation, self-organization mechanism using intrinsic plasticity (IP) and synaptic plasticity (SP) should be implemented in the spiking RNN. Therefore, we propose hardware-oriented models of these functions. To implement the function of IP, a variable firing threshold is introduced to each excitatory neuron in the RNN that changes stepwise in accordance with its activity. We also define other thresholds for SP that synchronize with the firing threshold, which determine the direction of stepwise synaptic update that is executed on receiving a pre-synaptic spike. To discuss the effectiveness of our model, we perform simulations of temporal data learning and anomaly detection using publicly available electrocardiograms (ECGs) with a spiking RNN. We observe that the spiking RNN with our IP and SP models realizes the true positive rate of 1 with the false positive rate being suppressed at 0 successfully, which does not occur otherwise. Furthermore, we find that these thresholds as well as the synaptic weights can be reduced to binary if the RNN architecture is appropriately designed. This contributes to minimization of the circuit of the neuronal system having IP and SP.

Indexed as

intrinsic plasticityneuromorphic chiprandomly connected neural networkspiking neural networksynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID39605789
PMCPMC11599226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.