ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Unique pharmacology of mGlu homo- and heterodimers.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGlus) are obligate dimer G protein coupled receptors that can all homodimerize and heterodimerize in select combinations. Responses of mGlu heterodimers to selective ligands, including orthosteric agonists and allosteric modulators, are largely unknown. Experimental Approach: The pharmacological properties of each group II and III mGlu homodimer (except mGlu6) and several heterodimers were examined when stochastically assembled in HEK293T cells, or specifically measured using an improved G protein mediated BRET assay employing complimented fragments of NanoLuciferase. Results: Stochastically assembled receptors adopted unique signaling characteristics. Some favored the potency, efficacy or signaling kinetics of a dominant subunit, while others exhibited blended profiles reflective of a combination of homo- and heterodimers at various ratios of expressed receptor. Finally, group II and III mGlu dimers were examined for responses to selective agonists and allosteric modulators. Effects of glutamate and selective group II and III orthosteric agonists were found to result in unique concentration response profiles when examining each combination of group II and II mGlu. Effects of select allosteric modulators were examined for each mGlu2 containing dimer as well as several group III dimer pairs. Likewise, allosteric modulator effects were often unique across dimers containing the targeted subunit of the ligand being tested. Conclusions: Results demonstrate that mGlu dimers respond uniquely to selective ligands, and show that the mGlu family is not governed by generalizable rules dictating consequences of dimeric subunit interactions leading to signaling consequences.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.