ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
The impact of transplant location on the gut microbiome and resistome in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at home versus in the hospital.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Home-based hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a novel approach that has the potential to improve outcomes, however, the impact of transplant location on the gut microbiome remains uncharacterized. We hypothesized that patients randomized to undergo home HCT would have higher gut taxonomic diversity and lower antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene abundance compared to those undergoing standard hospital HCT. Methods: We identified 28 patients enrolled in Phase II randomized trials of home (n=16) v. hospital (n=12) HCT at Duke and performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing of stools to compare taxonomic and AMR gene composition between groups. We performed a secondary analysis of patients from each group transplanted at an outpatient infusion clinic with those who underwent standard inpatient HCT ("outpatient" v. "inpatient"). Results: No significant differences in duration of hospitalization were found in those randomized to home v. hospital HCT. Taxonomic and AMR gene α- and β-diversity were comparable. In contrast, secondary analyses demonstrated that patients from both home and hospital groups transplanted at an outpatient infusion clinic spent significantly less time in the hospital and demonstrated higher taxonomic α-diversity and differential β-diversity compared to standard inpatient HCT, although AMR gene α-diversity did not differ, and comparisons were confounded by both differences in transplant type and use of antibiotics. Conclusions: Randomization by transplant location did not impact the gut microbiota to the same extent as the duration of hospitalization, although secondary analyses were heavily confounded. Even when taxonomic differences were observed, AMR genes were similar between groups.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.