ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Latent encoding of movement in primary visual cortex.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) are classically thought to encode spatial features of visual stimuli through simple population codes: each neuron exhibits a preferred orientation and preferred spatial frequency, both of which remaining invariant to other aspects of the visual stimulus. Here, we show that this simple rule does not apply to the representation of major features of stimulus motion, including stimulus direction and temporal frequency (TF). We collected an extensive dataset of cat (of either sex) V1 responses to stimuli covarying in orientation, direction, spatial frequency, and TF to assess the extent of motion selectivity. We show that preferred TF is mostly uniform across the cortical surface. Yet, in over half of V1, the preferred direction is reversed with changing stimulus TF, revealing four distinct map motifs embedded in V1's functional architecture. Similarly, despite the lack of spatial modulation for the preferred TF map and the lack of invariance for the preferred direction map, we found using convolutional neural networks that direction, TF and stimulus speed can be accurately decoded from V1 responses at all cortical locations. These findings suggest that subtle modulations of V1 activity may convey fine information about stimulus motion, pointing to a novel primary sensory encoding mechanism despite complex co-variation of responses to multiple attributes across V1 neurons.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.