Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39605506›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

phage therapy candidates from Sphae: An automated toolkit for predicting sequencing data.

Bhavya Papudeshi, Michael J Roach, Vijini Mallawaarachchi, George Bouras, Susanna R Grigson, Sarah K Giles, Clarice M Harker, Abbey L K Hutton, Anita Tarasenko, Laura K Inglis and 8 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Bhavya PapudeshiFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5359-3100
Michael J RoachFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1488-5148
Vijini MallawaarachchiFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2651-8719
George BourasAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5885-4186
Susanna R GrigsonFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-3451
Sarah K GilesFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4395-060X
Clarice M HarkerFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-6802-6799
Abbey L K HuttonFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2474-1327
Anita TarasenkoFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-4283-2374
Laura K InglisFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7919-8563
Alejandro A VegaDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9733-0468
Cole SouzaDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-2294-0363
Lance BolingDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-2505-4757
Hamza HajamaDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.
Ana Georgina Cobián GüemesDepartment of Pathology, University of San Diego, 500 Gilman Drive, MC 0612, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0755-5864
Anca M SegallDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8454-5248
Elizabeth A DinsdaleFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2177-203X
Robert A EdwardsFlinders Accelerator for Microbiome Exploration, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8383-8949

Funding

Computational and Experimental Resources for Virome Analysis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (CERVAID)RC2DK116713 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, DAVID · 2019 to 2023
$8.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS RC2 DK116713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Phage therapy is a viable alternative for treating bacterial infections amidst the escalating threat of antimicrobial resistance. However, the therapeutic success of phage therapy depends on selecting safe and effective phage candidates. While experimental methods focus on isolating phages and determining their lifecycle and host range, comprehensive genomic screening is critical to identify markers that indicate potential risks, such as toxins, antimicrobial resistance, or temperate lifecycle traits. These analyses are often labor-intensive and time-consuming, limiting the rapid deployment of phage in clinical settings. Results: We developed Sphae, an automated bioinformatics pipeline designed to streamline therapeutic potential of a phage in under ten minutes. Using Snakemake workflow manager, Sphae integrates tools for quality control, assembly, genome assessment, and annotation tailored specifically for phage biology. Sphae automates the detection of key genomic markers, including virulence factors, antimicrobial resistance genes, and lysogeny indicators like integrase, recombinase, and transposase, which could preclude therapeutic use. Benchmarked on 65 phage sequences, 28 phage samples showed therapeutic potential, 8 failed during assembly due to low sequencing depth, 22 samples included prophage or virulent markers, and the remaining 23 samples included multiple phage genomes per sample. This workflow outputs a comprehensive report, enabling rapid assessment of phage safety and suitability for phage therapy under these criteria. Sphae is scalable, portable, facilitating efficient deployment across most high-performance computing (HPC) and cloud platforms, expediting the genomic evaluation process. Availability: Sphae is source code and freely available at https://github.com/linsalrob/sphae, with installation supported on Conda, PyPi, Docker containers.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceautomated pipelinegenome characterizationphage therapysnakemake

Identifiers

PMID39605506
PMCPMC11601643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.