Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39605281›Full record

ArticleGenetics2025

Debunking the dogma that RecBCD nuclease destroys phage.

Clarence Zheng, Curtis Furukawa, Jerry Liu, Srishti Sankaran, Han Lin, Nidhi Munugeti, Meranda Wang, Gerald R Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Clarence ZhengDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-6578-6364
Curtis FurukawaUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Jerry LiuDuke University, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
Srishti SankaranBrown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Han Lin4654 SE Bakken Ct, Port Orchard, WA 98366, USA.
Nidhi Munugeti1117 141st Pl NE, Bellevue, WA 98007, USA.
Meranda Wang13450 NE 12th Pl, Bellevue, WA 98005, USA.
Gerald R SmithFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8747-1352

Funding

Molecular analysis of genetic recombination and DNA break repairR35GM118120 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI SMITH, GERALD R · 2016 to 2025
$9.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118120NIH HHS R35 GM118120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, it has been repeatedly claimed that the potent bacterial helicase-nuclease RecBCD (exonuclease V) destroys foreign (nonself) DNA, such as that of phages, but repairs and recombines cellular (self) DNA. While this would constitute a strong host-survival mechanism, no phage destroyed by RecBCD is ever specified in those claims. To determine which phages are destroyed by RecBCD, we searched for phage isolates that grow on Escherichia coli ΔrecBCD but not on recBCD+. In contrast to the prevailing claim, we found none among >80 new isolates from nature and >80 from previous collections. Based on these and previous observations, we conclude that RecBCD repairs broken DNA that can recombine but destroys DNA that cannot recombine and recycles the nucleotides.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesEscherichia coli ProteinsExodeoxyribonuclease VEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsExodeoxyribonuclease Vexodeoxyribonuclease V, E coliE. colienvironmental phagesphage destruction dogmaRecBCD helicase-nuclease

Identifiers

PMID39605281
PMCPMC12239210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.