SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2024
Mortality in septic patients treated with short-acting betablockers: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-of-the-art review: ß-blockade in critical illness.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Beyond the Pump: Unravelling Immunometabolic Crosstalk and Organelle Dynamics in Sepsis-Induced Cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Nebivolol as a potential adjunct therapy for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: evidence from a rat model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias in critical care patients with sepsis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Influence of heart rate trajectory in 30-day mortality in sepsis patients: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Beta-blockers in adults with acute traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- Review
- Septic Cardiomyopathy: Difficult Definition, Challenging Diagnosis, Unclear Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreatment with short-acting betablockers in septic patients remains controversial. Two recent large multicenter trials have provided additional evidence on this therapeutic approach. We thus performed a meta-analysis, including the most recent data, to evaluate the potential impacts of treatment with short-acting betablockers on mortality in adult septic patients.
methodsThe data search included PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library. A meta-analysis of all eligible peer-reviewed studies was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Only randomized, controlled studies with valid classifications of sepsis and intravenous treatment with short-acting betablockers (landiolol or esmolol) were included. Short-term mortality served as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included effects on short-term mortality regarding patient age and cardiac rhythm.
resultsA total of seven studies summarizing 854 patients fulfilled the predefined criteria and were included. Short-term mortality as well as pooled mortality (longest period of data on mortality) was not significantly impacted by treatment with short-acting betablockers when compared to the reference treatment (Risk difference, - 0.10 [95% CI, - 0.22 to 0.02]; p = 0.11; p for Cochran's Q test = 0.001; I
conclusionAdministration of short-acting betablockers did not reduce short-term mortality in septic patients with persistent tachycardia. Future studies should also provide extensive hemodynamic data to enable characterization of cardiac function before and during treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.