ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Clinical application of standardization right thoracic incision for thoracoscopic thymic tumor resection.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection: a propensity score-matched analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the continuous development of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, thoracoscopic thymectomy has become a routine operation. This method, now widely recognized, better protects lung function, reduces intraoperative blood loss and pain, and shortens postoperative hospital stay. We now introduce a standardized right thoracic incision for thoracoscopic thymic tumor resection, which has achieved favorable clinical outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective study involves 63 patients who underwent standardized right thoracic incision for thoracoscopic thymic tumor resection from October 2022 to January 2024. We analyzed the relevant clinical data, including postoperative pathological diagnosis, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, chest tube drainage duration, postoperative hospital stay, and follow-up data.
resultsAll 63 patients underwent thoracoscopic surgery. Thoracoscopic surgery excised thymic tumors and mediastinal fat in 62 cases, while 1 case of thymic carcinoma underwent thoracoscopic biopsy due to invasion of the superior vena cava and innominate vein. Postoperative pathological diagnosis revealed thymoma in 35 cases (33 cases of thymoma and 2 cases of thymic adenocarcinoma). R0 resection was achieved in 33 cases and R1 resection in 1 case. Additionally, 2 patients diagnosed with thymic adenocarcinoma were advised to undergo postoperative radiotherapy. Postoperative pathological diagnosis of the other 28 cases showed thymus hyperplasia in 13 cases and thymus cysts in 15 cases. The mean operation time was 57.3 ± 14.2 min, and intraoperative blood loss was 22.5 ± 14.7 ml. The mean chest tube drainage duration was 2.7 ± 1.3 days, and the postoperative hospital stay was 3.7 ± 1.4 days. No secondary operations were required, and no severe complications or mortality were observed during the perioperative period. All patients were discharged smoothly after surgery. Ten patients were not followed up due to recent surgery. The remaining 53 patients were followed up for 6 to 12 months, with no recurrence or distant metastasis observed.
conclusionThe standardized right thoracic incision for thoracoscopic thymic tumor resection simplifies the procedure of thymectomy. The operation's risk points are relatively fixed, making it safe and feasible. It is easy for the operator to master, and the thymic tumor resection rate is high. It possesses characteristics of being minimally invasive, enabling rapid recovery, having fewer complications, and requiring simple perioperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.