Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39605008›Full record

ArticleBMC nutrition2024

Consumption of resistant potato starch produces changes in gut microbiota that correlate with improvements in abnormal bowel symptoms: a secondary analysis of a clinical trial.

Jason R Bush, Michelle J Alfa

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05242913 (A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Effects of Resistant Potato Starch), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05242913 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Effects of Resistant Potato Starch (SolnulTM) on Intestinal Flora

TypeinterventionalSponsorMSP Starch Products Inc.Ran2019 to 2020Enrolled75ConditionsMicrobiotaArmsResistant Potato Starch, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jason R BushMSP Starch Products Inc., Carberry, MB, Canada. jbush@solnul.com.
Michelle J AlfaAlfaMed Consulting, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have linked a lack of dietary fibre, including resistant starch (RS), to disease-associated changes in intestinal bacteria. Healthy people often report abnormal bowel symptoms (ABS), including bloating, constipation, abdominal pain, and diarrhea, however, connections between these symptoms and the gut microbiota are poorly understood. Determining correlations between ABS and taxonomic groups may provide predictive value for using prebiotics to mitigate ABS in combination with stool microbiome testing.

methodsPost hoc analysis of a three-arm randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the effects of 3.5 g and 7 g resistant potato starch (RPS) doses or placebo was conducted. The study population (n = 70) were healthy adults aged 18-69 years old living in and around Guelph, ON. Participants evaluated their stools using the Bristol Stool Chart and also recorded any ABS daily. The presence of ABS was compared between treatment arms at baseline and changes in ABS were compared within treatment arms over 1- and 4-week periods. Pearson correlation analysis was used to identify significant relationships between changes in ABS and changes in bacterial taxa.

resultsAbdominal pain, belching, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, gas, and feeling unwell were reported by participants at low levels at baseline. Neither RPS nor placebo had significant effects on mean ABS scores. However, we identified positive correlations between treatment-dependent changes in symptoms and changes in Granulicatella, Haemophilus, Lachnospira, Olsenella, Papillibacter, Turicibacter, unclassified Enterobacteriaceae, unclassified Fusobacteriaceae, unclassified Pasteurellaceae, and unclassified Gammaproteobacteria. We also identified negative correlations between treatment-dependent changes in symptoms and changes in Anaerotruncus, Dorea, RFN20, Victivallis, unclassified Coriobacteriaceae, and unclassified Oxalobacteraceae. These Pearson correlations were significant after correction for repeated testing. The mean relative abundance of these taxa did not change in response to treatment. Finally, macronutrient intake was unaffected by RPS or placebo treatments.

conclusionChanges in ABS can be positively or negatively correlated with changes in specific gut microbiota, creating opportunities for personalized microbiome-targeted interventions to resolve ABS.

trial registrationThe trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05242913) on February 16, 2022.

Indexed as

Abdominal painBelchingBiomarkerBloatingConstipationMicrobiomePotatoPrebioticResistant starch

Identifiers

PMID39605008
PMCPMC11600726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.