ArticleBMC nutrition2024
Consumption of resistant potato starch produces changes in gut microbiota that correlate with improvements in abnormal bowel symptoms: a secondary analysis of a clinical trial.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05242913 (A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Effects of Resistant Potato Starch), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Effects of Resistant Potato Starch (SolnulTM) on Intestinal Flora
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Reconstruction of the Gut Microecosystem in Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders: Roles of Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics and Postbiotics.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Daily fiber supplementation after bariatric surgery demonstrates tolerability and influence on the fecal gut microbiome.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Ketogenic diets and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a literature review.Cell & bioscience · 2025Review
- Resistant Potato Starch Supplementation Increases the Serum Levels of Choline and Sphingomyelins Without Affecting Trimethylamine Oxide Levels.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Resistant Potato Starch Supplementation Increases Serum Antioxidant Levels in a Randomized Trial.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Resistant Starch and Microbiota-Derived Secondary Metabolites: A Focus on Postbiotic Pathways in Gut Health and Irritable Bowel Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Resistant Potato Starch Supplementation Reduces Serum Free Fatty Acid Levels and Influences Bile Acid Metabolism.Metabolites · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies have linked a lack of dietary fibre, including resistant starch (RS), to disease-associated changes in intestinal bacteria. Healthy people often report abnormal bowel symptoms (ABS), including bloating, constipation, abdominal pain, and diarrhea, however, connections between these symptoms and the gut microbiota are poorly understood. Determining correlations between ABS and taxonomic groups may provide predictive value for using prebiotics to mitigate ABS in combination with stool microbiome testing.
methodsPost hoc analysis of a three-arm randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the effects of 3.5 g and 7 g resistant potato starch (RPS) doses or placebo was conducted. The study population (n = 70) were healthy adults aged 18-69 years old living in and around Guelph, ON. Participants evaluated their stools using the Bristol Stool Chart and also recorded any ABS daily. The presence of ABS was compared between treatment arms at baseline and changes in ABS were compared within treatment arms over 1- and 4-week periods. Pearson correlation analysis was used to identify significant relationships between changes in ABS and changes in bacterial taxa.
resultsAbdominal pain, belching, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, gas, and feeling unwell were reported by participants at low levels at baseline. Neither RPS nor placebo had significant effects on mean ABS scores. However, we identified positive correlations between treatment-dependent changes in symptoms and changes in Granulicatella, Haemophilus, Lachnospira, Olsenella, Papillibacter, Turicibacter, unclassified Enterobacteriaceae, unclassified Fusobacteriaceae, unclassified Pasteurellaceae, and unclassified Gammaproteobacteria. We also identified negative correlations between treatment-dependent changes in symptoms and changes in Anaerotruncus, Dorea, RFN20, Victivallis, unclassified Coriobacteriaceae, and unclassified Oxalobacteraceae. These Pearson correlations were significant after correction for repeated testing. The mean relative abundance of these taxa did not change in response to treatment. Finally, macronutrient intake was unaffected by RPS or placebo treatments.
conclusionChanges in ABS can be positively or negatively correlated with changes in specific gut microbiota, creating opportunities for personalized microbiome-targeted interventions to resolve ABS.
trial registrationThe trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05242913) on February 16, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.