ArticleBMC medicine2024
Even moderate liver fat accumulation below conventional fatty liver cutoffs is linked to multiple metabolomic alterations and gestational dysglycemia in Asian women of reproductive age.
Article in BMC medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide cohort study.Hepatology international · 2026Article
- Maternal metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease during pregnancy and its impact on offspring steatosis.Clinical nutrition ESPEN · 2025Observational
- Prevalence of Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis in Asian Indian Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is not clear if conventional liver fat cutoff of 5.56% weight which has been used for identifying fatty liver in western populations is also applicable for Asians. In Asian women of reproductive age, we evaluate the optimum metabolic syndrome (MetS)-linked liver fat cutoff, the specific metabolomic alterations apparent at this cutoff, as well as prospective associations of preconception liver fat levels with gestational dysglycemia.
methodsLiver fat (measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy), MetS, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based plasma metabolomic profiles were assessed in 382 Asian women, who were planning to conceive. Ninety-eight women went on to become pregnant and received an oral glucose tolerance test at week 26 of gestation.
resultsThe optimum liver fat cutoff for diagnosing MetS was 2.07%weight. Preconception liver fat was categorized into Low (liver fat < 2.07%), Moderate (2.07% ≤ liver fat < 5.56%), and High (liver fat ≥ 5.56%) groups. Individual MetS traits showed worsening trends, going from Low to Moderate to High groups. Multiple plasma metabolomic alterations, previously linked to incident type 2 diabetes (T2D), were already evident in the Moderate group (adjusted for ethnicity, age, parity, educational attainment, and BMI). Both a cross-sectional multi-metabolite score for incident T2D and mid-gestational glucose area under the curve showed increasing trends, going from Low to Moderate to High groups (p < 0.001 for both). Gestational diabetes incidence was 2-fold (p = 0.23) and 7-fold (p < 0.001) higher in the Moderate and High groups relative to the Low group.
conclusionsIn Asian women of reproductive age, moderate liver fat accumulation below the conventional fatty liver cutoff was not metabolically benign and was linked to gestational dysglycemia. The newly derived cutoff can aid in screening individuals before adverse metabolic phenotypes have consolidated, which provides a longer window for preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.