Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Transverse versus longitudinal skin incision in first extensor tendon release for radial styloid tenosynovitis: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimal Skin Incision for the Surgical Treatment of De Quervain Tenosynovitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDe Quervain's tenosynovitis, characterized by the entrapment of the extensor pollicis brevis and abductor pollicis longus tendons in the first extensor compartment, leads to pain and swelling near the radial styloid. When conservative treatments including rest and antiinflammatory medications fail, surgery is often recommended. This study aimed to compare transverse and longitudinal skin incisions with respect to surgical scars, postoperative pain, and functional outcomes in the open release of the first extensor compartment in radial styloid tenosynovitis.
methodsSeventy patients were randomly assigned to either the transverse or longitudinal skin incision group using a computer-generated random number table. Postoperative scarring was assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), pain intensity using a verbal numerical rating scale, and functional outcomes using the Thai version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire at 2, 6, and 12 weeks post-surgery. Continuous data were presented as mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed data or as median (interquartile range) for skewed distributions.
resultsFollowing surgery, both groups showed marked improvements in Thai PRWE and POSAS scores, with no differences in functional outcomes. The longitudinal incision group had significant pain reduction at 2 and 6 weeks post-surgery. By 12 weeks, pain alleviation was similar in both groups. Wound infection was not observed in any case, and three patients reported temporary paresthesia, which was not statistically significant between the groups.
conclusionsBoth techniques demonstrate similar improvements in functional scores and reductions in pain scores, with no significant differences in complication rates, particularly concerning hypertrophic scars. The decision between transverse and longitudinal skin incisions should consider the surgeon's expertise, the patient's anatomical characteristics, and the complexity of the surgical procedure. Each approach presents distinct trade-offs, highlighting the necessity of a personalized, patient-centered strategy to optimize surgical outcomes.
trial registrationThe study was registered on 27/06/2023, at clinicaltrials.in.th (TCTR20230627001). This study was retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.