ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Effects of two posterior procedures for treatment of cervical hyperextension injury with multilevel spinal stenosis: A retrospective study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative study of O-arm navigation-assisted OLIF 360 versus traditional OLIF combined with Mazor Renaissance robot-assisted posterior fixation for single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis: clinical and radiographic outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCervical hyperextension injuries (CHI), commonly resulting in central cord syndrome and spinal instability, often affect the elderly with preexisting degenerative spinal changes, leading to a need for surgical interventions that address both the compression and stability of the cervical spine. This study compares the clinical outcomes of two posterior decompression and fixation procedures for treating cervical hyperextension injury in patients with preexisting multilevel spinal canal stenosis.
methodsPatients suffering from cervical hyperextension injury combined with multilevel spinal stenosis were divided into two groups. They received laminoplasty combined with selective unilateral pedicle screw fixation or laminectomy combined with bilateral lateral mass screw fixation. The clinical records including demographic data, operation time, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss and surgical complications were collected, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. Preoperative and postoperative cervical lordosis were measured.
resultsPostoperative AISA scores were significantly increased compared with that before surgery in both groups, there was no significant differences between groups. The intraoperative blood loss in the laminoplasty group was significantly less than that in the laminectomy group and there were no significant differences in operation time and length of hospital stay between the two groups. No significant difference was found in the incidence of overall surgical complications between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the cervical lordosis after surgery compared with that before surgery in both groups.
conclusionsFor patients suffering from cervical hyperextension injury combined with preexisting multilevel spinal stenosis, both cervical laminoplasty with selective unilateral pedicle screw fixation and laminectomy with bilateral lateral mass screw fixation could achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.