ArticleBMC cancer2024
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development and validation of a habitat-based computed tomography radiomics model for differentiating isolated lung cancer, isolated tuberculoma, and coexistence of tuberculosis with lung cancer: a dual-center retrospective study.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Prognostic Stratification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Unlocking the potential of radiomics in predicting the response of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for operable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Ensemble learning strategy-based 18 F-FDG PET/CT metabolic habitats radiomics for predicting EGFR mutation and prognosis in LA-NSCLC: a multi-center study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- The predictive value ofFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Integrative multi-region MRI radiomics and clinical nomogram for preoperative lymphovascular invasion prediction in rectal cancer: a multicenter validation.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Application of multimodal fusion technology in early recurrence prediction and pathological analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence and ensemble learning for hepatocellular carcinoma classification: State of the art, performance, and clinical implications.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Habitat-based transformer model in pretreatmentBMC cancer · 2025Article
- Visual Perception and Pre-Attentive Attributes in Oncological Data Visualisation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to develop habitat radiomic models to predict overall survival (OS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), based on the characterization of the intratumoral heterogeneity reflected in
methodsA total of 137 HCC patients from two institutions were retrospectively included. First, intratumoral habitats were achieved by a two-step unsupervised clustering process based on k-means clustering. Second, a total of 4032 radiomic features were extracted based on each habitat, including 2016 PET-based and 2016 CT-based radiomic features. Then, after feature selection, the stacking ensemble learning approach which combined six machine learning classifiers as the first-level learners with Cox proportional hazards regression as the second-level learner, was employed to build multiple radiomic models. Finally, the optimal model was selected based on the calculation of the C-index, and a combined model integrating with a clinical model was also constructed to identify the potentially complementary effect.
resultsThree spatially distinct habitats were identified in the two cohorts. Among a total of 30 stacking ensemble learning models established based on different combinations of 5 types of segmented volumes of interest (VOIs) with 6 types of classifiers, the MLP-Cox-habitat-2 model was selected as the optimal radiomic model with a C-index of 0.702 in the external validation cohort. Furthermore, the combined model integrating the optimal radiomic model with the clinical model achieved an improved C-index of 0.747. Consistently, the combined model outperformed the other models for OS prediction, with a time-dependent AUC of 0.835, 0.828, and 0.800 in the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS, respectively.
conclusion
trial registrationThis study was a retrospective study, so it was free from registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.