Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604889›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

The relationship between ethnicity and place of birth in England: a mixed-methods study.

Frances Rivers, Christopher Grollman, Zahra Khan, Marina A S Daniele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frances RiversKingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Galsworthy Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT2 7QB, England. frances.rivers@nhs.net.
Christopher GrollmanSchool of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, England.
Zahra KhanSchool of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, England.
Marina A S DanieleSchool of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUK maternity policy advocates a choice of birthplace in an obstetric-led unit (OU), a midwife-led unit (MLU) or at home. Although robust evidence supports the safety of birth in midwife-led settings, particularly for women with uncomplicated pregnancies, most births are in the OU. Women and babies from ethnic minority communities experience major health disparities and inequitable care, but there is limited research examining birthplace choices through an ethnicity lens. This study investigated the association between ethnicity and place of birth at an urban NHS Trust in England.

methodsA mixed-methods sequential explanatory study. Analysis of births from 2014-2023 at a London NHS Trust included multivariable logistic regression analysis of birthplace by ethnicity. Planned or pre-labour Caesareans, pre-term, and multiple births were excluded. Significant disparities between White and South Asian women were identified which informed the focus of the qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews with 10 women of South Asian heritage who had given birth in the OU, the alongside MLU or at home were conducted and analysed thematically.

resultsMore White women gave birth in midwife-led settings (27.5%) than all other ethnicities, particularly South Asian women (20.6%). South Asian women had fewer homebirths (0.8%) than White women (2.7%) and were much less likely to birth in a midwife-led setting after adjusting for parity, maternal age, BMI, previous Caesarean, presence of diabetes or hypertensive disorders and onset of labour (aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.73, p < 0.001). Places of birth were similar for Black and White women, although the number of Black women in the population was too low to detect significant differences. Themes generated from interviews included the assumption that birth is hospital-based and doctor-led; choosing a midwife-led birth setting went against the cultural norm, but felt safe - physically, psychologically and culturally.

conclusionsThere are ethnic disparities in place of birth. Cultural factors seem influential, but barriers to choice, such as limited evidence-sharing by midwives, may disproportionately affect women from ethnic minority communities, who may particularly benefit from midwife-led birth settings. Women need personalised information about options. Improving choice of birthplace is a step towards reducing health inequalities and promoting optimal health.

Indexed as

Birth SettingEthnicityMidwiferyAdultAsian PeopleDelivery, ObstetricEnglandFemaleHome ChildbirthHumansParturitionPregnancyQualitative ResearchWhite PeopleYoung AdultBirth centreBirthplaceEthnicityEthnic minorityHomebirthMidwife-led unitSouth Asian

Identifiers

PMID39604889
PMCPMC11600555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.