ArticleBMC anesthesiology2024
A comprehensive analysis of in-hospital adverse events after scopolamine administration: insights from a retrospective cohort study using a large nationwide inpatient database.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Animal models of delirium: a narrative review.Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
- Letter to the Editor: "Effects of motion sickness patch on postoperative nausea and vomiting in female patients undergoing thyroid surgery: a randomized clinical trial".International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScopolamine is a widely used antiemetic in anesthetic practice, particularly for postoperative and post-discharge nausea and vomiting. Despite its frequent usage and recognized efficacy, concerns have emerged regarding the potential for increased side effects, particularly in elderly patients. Further research is needed to assess safety and determine age thresholds for adverse events. This study hypothesizes associations between perioperative scopolamine use, worse clinical outcomes, increased pneumonia, delirium, urinary retention, and readmissions.
methodsA large, retrospective cohort study was performed using the TriNetX Analytics Network database on patients undergoing major surgical procedures between Jan 1, 2009, and March 21, 2018, to examine the impact of perioperative scopolamine use on in-hospital adverse events. Patients were divided into age groups and compared to a control group. The primary outcomes assessed were delirium, pneumonia, in-hospital death, new antipsychotic use, readmission, and new onset urinary retention within 7 days post-surgery. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias. Relative risk and risk differences with 95% confidence intervals were estimated.
resultsAfter 1:1 propensity score matching, we identified a total of 403,816 (201,908 pairs) perioperative scopolamine users and nonusers. The cohorts of 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70 + contained 22,910 (11,455 pairs), 44,170 (22,085 pairs), 58,590 (29,295 pairs), 71,660 (35,830 pairs), 88,386 (44,193 pairs), and 118,100 (59,050 pairs) patients respectively. Across older age cohorts, after propensity score matching, perioperative scopolamine recipients had significantly increased relative risk and risk difference of delirium, pneumonia, in-hospital mortality, new antipsychotic use, readmission, and new-onset urinary retention.
conclusionsIn this cohort study, perioperative scopolamine usage was associated with a significantly increased risk of in-hospital adverse events, both within the 70 + age cohort and among the 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-69 age cohorts after major surgery. These findings highlight the need for careful assessment of scopolamine's risks and benefits, especially for patients aged 40 and older. Scopolamine may be most suited for post-discharge nausea and vomiting in ambulatory patients and clinicians should reassess its standard use for postoperative nausea and vomiting, favoring shorter-acting agents with fewer side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.