Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604793›Full record

ArticleThe Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry2025

The missing middle service gap: Obtaining a consensus definition of the 'Missing Middle' in youth mental health.

Jana M Menssink, Caroline X Gao, Isabel Zbukvic, Sophie Prober, Athina Kakkos, Alice Watson, Sue M Cotton, Kate M Filia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Increasing Youth Peer Workers' Impact Through Integration: Peer Worker Perspectives on Best Practice in Youth Mental Health.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jana M MenssinkFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0109-952X
Caroline X GaoFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0987-2759
Isabel ZbukvicFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6816-1199
Sophie ProberOrygen, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Athina KakkosFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Alice WatsonFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sue M CottonFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9386-8348
Kate M FiliaFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6581-5890

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Partnership Grants APP1076940National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Partnership Grants APP1198696Orygen, The University of Melbourne, headspace, The Department of Health and Ambulance Victoria
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs highlighted in Australia's Productivity Commission Inquiry into mental health, subgroups of individuals are failing to have their needs met, or are 'falling through the cracks' in the current system - a phenomenon increasingly referred to as the 'missing middle'. A barrier to devising solutions is that the term 'missing middle' is not clearly defined. Using the Delphi method, we aimed to define the term and explore acceptability.

methodThree expert groups were recruited: carers and young people with a lived experience of mental ill-health; clinicians and service providers; researchers, policymakers and commissioners of mental health services. Using a three-stage Delphi process, we elicited definitions, refined and developed a consensus definition.

resultsTen subthemes describing the 'missing middle' were identified, with four endorsed across all expert groups from the outset: service gap, inflexibility, inadequate service quality and duration, and social disadvantage. Additional subthemes were later endorsed. Feedback was sought on a consensus-driven definition that encompassed the original four endorsed subthemes. Findings supported a shift to a systemic focus - framing the 'missing middle' as a care gap.

conclusionsA consensus definition was developed, repositioning the term to a systems lens, describing a 'missing middle service gap'. The definition represents the 'missing middle' as a term to describe a gap in care where existing mental health services are not meeting the needs of individuals in a meaningful way. Research was carried out in relation to youth mental health in Australia and the definition may need to be adapted for other contexts.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdolescentAustraliaConsensus Statements as TopicDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultcare gapsdelphi studymental healthmissing middlemissing middle service gapservice gaptreatment gapYouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID39604793
PMCPMC11783981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.