Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604742›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2025

An insight for Fracture Liaison Service implementation: a qualitative study from a developing country.

Foziye Tahmasbi, Mozhdeh Zabihiyeganeh, Farahnaz Sadoughi, Abbas Sheikhtaheri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bone Health, Fragility Fractures, and the Hand Surgeon.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Foziye TahmasbiDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8813-2539
Mozhdeh ZabihiyeganehBone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farahnaz SadoughiDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Sadoughi.f@iums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7452-0864
Abbas SheikhtaheriHealth Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6879-5415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION /

objectiveOsteoporosis often goes undetected until the first fracture, significantly increasing the risk of subsequent fractures. The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) model aims to prevent secondary fractures and improve osteoporosis management. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of FLS implementation in Iran, applying the essential elements outlined in the FLS framework.

methodThis qualitative study used framework analysis to explore key components of the FLS framework from the perspectives of Iranian experts. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted over a 3-month period. Collaborative scenario synthesis was employed to accurately reflect the complexities of FLS operations.

resultsA total of 13 participants with an average practical experience of 3.2 years contributed to the study. The results covered the people involved, needed information, locations, timeframes, and operational details of FLS stages, as well as quality improvement. The study confirmed the FLS framework's applicability in describing an implemented FLS and highlighted areas for improvement, such as coordinator training, role clarification, and data management issues.

conclusionGiven the scarcity of comprehensive studies on FLS within Iran's context and the recent growth and expansion of FLS initiatives in the country, this study offers insights into FLS implementation from the perspective of experts, serving as a guiding resource for future initiatives in this domain. Future research may benefit from developing tailored questionnaires based on the FLS framework to gather insights from a larger population for a better assessment. Key points • Iran lacks specialized training programs for FLS coordinators. Developing these programs is crucial, particularly for healthcare professionals from non-nursing specialties. • There is a lack of clarity regarding the timeline for each stage of the FLS process. A context-specific timeline is needed to optimize service implementation and workflow. • There are inaccuracies in coding patient information that pose significant challenges, potentially undermining hospital statistics and the quality of FLS data.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesDeveloping CountriesHumansIranQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementFracture Liaison ServiceFrameworkInterviewIran

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.