ArticleClinical oral investigations2024
Automatic jawbone structure segmentation on dental CBCT images via deep learning.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transformer-based models in dentistry: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- A novel fluoride tray-assisted workflow for artificial intelligence-driven automated maxillary gingival segmentation on cone beam CT.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of AI-Assisted and Manual CBCT-Derived Graft Volume Measurements for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CBCT Image Superimposition for Longitudinal Monitoring of Mandibular Cyst Healing: A Technical Note.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- A deep learning based automated maxillary sinus segmentation and bone grafts analysis in CBCT images.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study developed and evaluated a two-stage deep learning-based system for automatic segmentation of mandibular cortical bone, mandibular cancellous bone, maxillary cortical bone and maxillary cancellous bone on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. MATERIALS AND
methodsA dataset containing 155 CBCT scans acquired with different parameters was obtained. A two-stage deep learning-based system was developed for automatically segmenting jawbone structures. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) were used to assess the segmentation performance of the system by comparing the automatic segmentation results with the ground truth. The impact of dental and quality abnormalities on segmentation performance was analysed, and a comparison of automatic segmentation (AS) with manually refined segmentation (MRS) was reported.
resultsThe system achieved promising segmentation performance, with average DSC values of 93.69%, 96.83%, 86.14% and 95.57% and average ASSD values of 0.13 mm, 0.16 mm, 0.29 mm and 0.41 mm for the mandibular cortical bone, mandibular cancellous bone, maxillary cortical bone and maxillary cancellous bone, respectively. Quality abnormalities had a negative impact on segmentation performance. The performance metrics (DSCs > 98.8% and ASSDs < 0.1 mm) indicated high overlap between the AS and MRS.
conclusionThe proposed system offers an accurate and time-efficient method for segmenting jawbone structures on CBCT images. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Automatically segmenting jawbone structures is essential in most digital dental workflows. The proposed system has considerable potential for application in digital clinical workflows to assist dentists in making more accurate diagnoses and developing patient-specific treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39604672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.