SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2025
Electrogastrography in Adult Gastroparesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastroparesis is a delay in gastric emptying without mechanical obstruction, lacking a clear pathophysiological mechanism, but with multiple histological abnormalities including loss of interstitial cells of Cajal, which may alter slow waves. We can assess slow waves with electrogastrography.
objectivesTo determine the prevalence and range of abnormalities in gastric slow waves in adults with gastroparesis using electrogastrography.
methodsWe systematically searched Medline, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. We included studies with patients older than 18 years with gastroparesis, assessed using electrogastrography. We evaluated the percentage of duration of the recording in which the dominant power was in normogastria, tachygastria, and bradygastria; dominant frequency; power ratio; change in post-stimulus dominant power; and dominant frequency instability coefficient. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Data were synthesized using narrative summary and meta-analysis.
resultsA total of 3730 articles were reviewed, including 31 articles with 1545 patients and 340 controls. Compared to controls, gastroparetics patients had less normogastria (fasting: 50.3% versus 65.8%) (post-stimulus: 54.3% versus 66.5%), more bradygastria (fasting: 37.7% versus 13%) (post-stimulus: 31.9% versus 16.3%), and more tachygastria (fasting: 16.1% versus 4.6%) (post-stimulus: 18.3% versus 5.2%). Gastroparetics had less change in post-stimulus dominant power (1.45 dB versus 5.03 dB) and less power ratio (1.4 versus 5.26).
conclusionsGastroparetic patients present abnormalities in the frequency and changes in the post-stimulus power of slow waves, possibly secondary to a reduced number of interstitial cells of Cajal, as described in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.