Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604651›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Radiomic features add incremental benefit to conventional radiological feature-based differential diagnosis of lung nodules.

Zhou Liu, Long Yang, JiuPing Liang, Binbin Wen, Zikun He, Yongsheng Xie, Honghong Luo, Qian Yang, Lijian Liu, Dehong Luo and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhou Liu *Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Long Yang *Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
JiuPing LiangDepartment of Radiology, Shenzhen Bao'an District Songgang People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Binbin WenLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Zikun HeDepartment of Radiology, Shenzhen Bao'an District Songgang People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yongsheng XieDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Honghong LuoDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Qian YangDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Lijian LiuDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Dehong LuoDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Li LiDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China. 27888691@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1661-6304
Na ZhangLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China. na.zhang@siat.ac.cn.

Funding

National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen SZ2020QN001Shenzhen Clinical Research Center for Cancer No. [2021] 287Shenzhen Science and Technology Program KCXFZ20201221173008022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the incremental benefit of adding radiomic features to conventional semantic radiological feature-based differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lung nodules.

methodsFrom May 2017 to March 2021, 393 patients with 465 pathologically confirmed lung nodules were enrolled with 54 patients with 54 lung nodules as external testing. Based on manually segmented lung nodules, 1409 radiomics features were extracted. Sixteen radiological features were obtained. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to select the most informative features from the two features set separately. Support vector machine (SVM) and logistic regression (LR) were used to build the models (radiomics model, radiological model, and combined model) with performance compared using the DeLong test.

resultsAfter feature selection, six radiological features, including shape, vascular convergence sign (type III), margin, density, pleural traction sign, and spiculation, and nine radiomics features were selected. In the independent testing and external testing, combined models had significantly higher AUCs than the corresponding radiomic models for both the SVM classifier (AUC: 0.871 vs. 0.773, p = 0.029; 0.810 vs. 0.706, p = 0.037) and LR classifier (AUC: 0.871 vs. 0.742, p = 0.008; 0.828 vs. 0.712, p = 0.044), and the corresponding radiological model for both the SVM classifier (AUC: 0.871 vs. 0.803, p = 0.015; 0.810 vs. 0.730, p = 0.045) and LR classifier (AUC: 0.871 vs. 0.818, p = 0.034; 0.828 vs. 0.756, p = 0.040).

conclusionRadiomics features could add incremental benefits to the conventional radiological feature-based differential diagnosis. KEY POINTS: Question Conventional semantic radiological feature-based differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lung nodules needs further improvement. Findings The model combining radiological features and radiomic features significantly outperforms a radiomic model and a radiological model. Clinical relevance Radiomic features could complement conventional radiological features to improve the differential diagnosis of lung nodules in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSolitary Pulmonary NoduleTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesSupport Vector MachineDifferential diagnosisImaging featureLung noduleRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.