ArticleEye (London, England)2025
Intersession repeatability of visual function and OCTA metrics in eyes with diabetic macular ischaemia.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate inter-session coefficient of repeatability (CR) of visual function and OCTA metrics over 3 months in diabetic macular ischaemia (DMI) in stable laser-treated proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) patients.
methodsThis prospective study recruited patients with stable PDR for at least 6 months following pan-retinal photocoagulation with visual acuity of at least 54 ETDRS letters. DMI was confirmed on OCTA as FAZ area of at least 0.5 mm
results88 eligible eyes of 63 participants were included in the analysis. The CR for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 10.1 ETDRS letters (95% CI 8.5-11.7 ETDRS letters), and for low luminance visual acuity (LLVA) was 12.4 letters (95% CI 10.4-14.4). The ICC for BCVA and LLVA was 0.81 and 0.75 respectively. For Square Root of Foveal Avascular Zone (SQRT-FAZ) area, CR and ICC was 0.043 mm and 1.00 respectively. The Bland-Altman plots suggest that the level of agreement is wider for vascular density (VD) metrics compared to FAZ parameters.
conclusionWe recommend using the FAZ metrics for quantitative measurements of DMI outcomes due to the excellent repeatability of manually corrected FAZ area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.