Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604623›Full record

Observational studyNature microbiology2024

Gut physiology and environment explain variations in human gut microbiome composition and metabolism.

Nicola Procházková, Martin F Laursen, Giorgia La Barbera, Eirini Tsekitsidi, Malte S Jørgensen, Morten A Rasmussen, Jeroen Raes, Tine R Licht, Lars O Dragsted, Henrik M Roager

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nature microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04804319 (Towards Personalized Dietary Recommendations Based on the Interaction Between Diet, Microbiome and Abiotic Conditions in the Gut), which is not on this map. Cited by 94 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04804319 completednot on this map

Towards Personalized Dietary Recommendations Based on the Interaction Between Diet, Microbiome and Abiotic Conditions in the Gut

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2021 to 2021Enrolled63ConditionsDiet, Healthy, Metabolic DiseaseArms9-days habitual diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicola ProcházkováDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1071-2488
Martin F LaursenNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6017-7121
Giorgia La BarberaDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0583-906X
Eirini TsekitsidiLaboratory of Hygiene, Social & Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Malte S JørgensenDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2541-0260
Morten A RasmussenDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Jeroen RaesDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1337-041X
Tine R LichtNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6399-9574
Lars O DragstedDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0609-6317
Henrik M RoagerDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. hero@nexs.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2504-8313

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF19OC0056246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human gut microbiome is highly personal. However, the contribution of gut physiology and environment to variations in the gut microbiome remains understudied. Here we performed an observational trial using multi-omics to profile microbiome composition and metabolism in 61 healthy adults for 9 consecutive days. We assessed day-to-day changes in gut environmental factors and measured whole-gut and segmental intestinal transit time and pH using a wireless motility capsule in a subset of 50 individuals. We observed substantial daily fluctuations, with intra-individual variations in gut microbiome and metabolism associated with changes in stool moisture and faecal pH, and inter-individual variations accounted for by whole-gut and segmental transit times and pH. Metabolites derived from microbial carbohydrate fermentation correlated negatively with the gut passage time and pH, while proteolytic metabolites and breath methane showed a positive correlation. Finally, we identified associations between segmental transit time/pH and coffee-, diet-, host- and microbial-derived metabolites. Our work suggests that gut physiology and environment are key to understanding the individuality of the human gut microbial composition and metabolism.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractAdultBacteriaDietFecesFemaleFermentationGastrointestinal TransitHealthy VolunteersHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMethaneMiddle AgedYoung AdultMethane

Identifiers

PMID39604623
PMCPMC11602727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.