Relevance of blast counts for genetic subclassification in MDS.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Clinical and Biological Insights into Myelodysplastic Neoplasms Associated with Deletions of Chromosome 5q Region.Hematology reports · 2025
   Review
2. Application of the International Working Group MDS molecular taxonomy classes to a single institution cohort.Blood neoplasia · 2025
   Article
3. A clinical guide to TP53 mutations in myeloid neoplasms.Blood · 2025
   Review
4. Validation of clinicopathologic features of a genetic myelodysplastic syndrome classification in an independent cohort.Journal of hematopathology · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.