Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604593›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2024

The Comparison between Pilot-Grade Spray Dryer and Laboratory-Grade Spray Dryer: Structure, Powder Properties and Application for Direct Compaction.

Zhe Li, Wanghai Peng, Fucai Chen, Lin Zhu, Abid Naeem, Weifeng Zhu, Yongmei Guan, Yi Feng, Yanni Wu, Xiao Lin and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhe Li *Key Laboratory of Modern Preparation of TCM, Ministry of Education, Institute for Advanced Study, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330004, People's Republic of China.
Wanghai Peng *Key Laboratory of Modern Preparation of TCM, Ministry of Education, Institute for Advanced Study, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330004, People's Republic of China.
Fucai ChenKey Laboratory of Modern Preparation of TCM, Ministry of Education, Institute for Advanced Study, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330004, People's Republic of China.
Lin ZhuKey Laboratory of Modern Preparation of TCM, Ministry of Education, Institute for Advanced Study, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330004, People's Republic of China.
Abid NaeemKey Laboratory of Modern Preparation of TCM, Ministry of Education, Institute for Advanced Study, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330004, People's Republic of China.
Weifeng ZhuKey Laboratory of Modern Preparation of TCM, Ministry of Education, Institute for Advanced Study, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330004, People's Republic of China.
Yongmei GuanKey Laboratory of Modern Preparation of TCM, Ministry of Education, Institute for Advanced Study, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330004, People's Republic of China.
Yi FengKey Laboratory of Modern Preparation of TCM, Ministry of Education, Institute for Advanced Study, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330004, People's Republic of China.
Yanni WuJiangzhong Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Nanchang, 330049, People's Republic of China.
Xiao LinKey Laboratory of Modern Preparation of TCM, Ministry of Education, Institute for Advanced Study, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330004, People's Republic of China. duotang@163.com.
Liangshan MingKey Laboratory of Modern Preparation of TCM, Ministry of Education, Institute for Advanced Study, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330004, People's Republic of China. mingls@jxutcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2971-822X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the improvements in direct compaction powder properties achieved through particle design using laboratory and pilot-scale spray dryers. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and polyvinylpyrrolidone were used as modifying agent, which have low hygroscopicity and surface tension, good flowability, and excellent compactibility. Ammonium bicarbonate and sodium bicarbonate were used as pore-forming agents, and the composite particles were prepared using laboratory and pilot-scale spray dryers. The results showed that the structure of the composite particles and porous particles can effectively improve the flowability, tabletability, and disintegration behaviour; the composite particles prepared by laboratory-scale spray drying have better tabletability; the composite particles prepared by spray drying at pilot-scale had better flowability. In summary, there are significant differences in the properties of products prepared by different scales of spray drying. It will be beneficial to choose the appropriate equipment and the appropriate experimental design. Consequently, this study may contribute to the development of natural plant tablets.

Indexed as

Hypromellose DerivativesParticle SizePovidonePowdersSpray DryingTabletsBicarbonatesChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug CompoundingExcipientsPilot ProjectsPorositySodium BicarbonateTechnology, Pharmaceuticalammonium bicarbonateBicarbonatesExcipientsHypromellose DerivativesPovidonePowdersSodium BicarbonateTabletsdirect compactionflowabilityparticle designspray dryingtabletability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.