Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604532›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Stress-strain curve predictions by crystal plasticity simulations and machine learning.

Dmitry S Bulgarevich, Makoto Watanabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dmitry S BulgarevichNational Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0047, Japan. bulgarevich.dmitry@nims.go.jp.
Makoto WatanabeNational Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0047, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stress-strain curve (SSC) prediction for additively manufactured as-build metal materials with laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a lengthy and tedious process. It involves the sophisticated representative volume element (RVE) reconstruction of complex experimental microstructures for subsequent state-of-the-art crystal plasticity simulations with hyperparameter tunings in the appropriate physical model. However, even with a well-fitted model, simulations with different RVEs or temperatures, for example, are too time-consuming and computationally intensive. In recent years, several attempts were directed towards the SSC predictions with machine learning (ML) tools to speed up this process. Mainly, the artificial neural networks (ANN) were reported so far for this purpose. Here, we present our version to predict the temperature dependence of SSCs for LPBF fabricated industrially important Hastelloy X with various ML methods. Compared to previously reported studies on this matter with direct link between the microstructures and SSCs, we directly link only experimental conditions and predicted SSCs, which could be more preferable for some application scenarios discussed below. It was found that due to the structure and "small" size of our training dataset, the decision tree-based ML regressors worked better than other popular ML methods.

Identifiers

PMID39604532
PMCPMC11603329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.