Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604517›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Optimized imaging for suspected acute organ bleeding].

Jonathan Nadjiri

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jonathan NadjiriInterventionelle Radiologie, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM Universitätsklinikum, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland. jonathan.nadjiri@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodological problemContrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is the standard procedure for diagnosing acute organ bleeding. It provides rapid, precise and comprehensive visualization of the bleeding situation, which is crucial in emergency situations. RADIOLOGICAL STANDARD PROCEDURES: The examination is usually conducted in three phases: native, arterial and venous. These phases enable the precise identification and localization of the source of bleeding. The CT imaging is not only used to confirm the diagnosis but also aids in planning further treatment, facilitating targeted preparation for interventional radiologists, surgeons and endoscopists. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: The possibilities for use of the technique in CT have significantly advanced in recent years. High-resolution CT scanners provide detailed images, which are particularly useful for detecting small bleedings and traumatic injuries. Multi-energy CT provides additional advantages by enabling virtual native examinations and mono-energetic image reconstructions, which enhance the visibility of iodine-based contrast agents. These technologies improve the sensitivity for detecting bleeding and enable a better characterization of the source of bleeding. RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PRACTICE: To optimize the CT diagnostics for bleeding, the use of a highly concentrated iodine contrast agent with a fast injection rate is recommended. Additionally, imaging data should be reconstructed with a slice thickness of 1-3 mm to achieve optimal diagnostic results. Multiplanar reconstructions are essential in all cases to ensure comprehensive imaging information. The combination of these advanced techniques and settings leads to improved diagnostics and treatment of acute organ bleeding.

Indexed as

HemorrhageRadiographic Image EnhancementTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcute DiseaseContrast MediaHumansContrast MediaComputed tomography angiographyHemorrhageInterventional radiologyMulti-energy computed tomographyTomography, X‑ray computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.