Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604484›Full record

SynthesisGene therapy2025

Gene-based therapy for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy types 1 and 2 : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bunchai Chongmelaxme, Varalee Yodsurang, Ponlawat Vichayachaipat, Thanate Srimatimanon, Oranee Sanmaneechai

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bunchai ChongmelaxmeSocial and Administrative Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Varalee YodsurangDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. varalee.y@pharm.chula.ac.th.ORCID 0000-0002-3622-532X
Ponlawat VichayachaipatDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Thanate SrimatimanonDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Oranee SanmaneechaiDivision of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. oranee141@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4557-0387

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite numerous studies identifying the advantages of therapies for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), healthcare professionals encounter obstacles in determining the most effective treatment. This study aimed to investigate the effects of gene-based therapy for SMA. A systematic search was conducted from inception to May 2024 across databases, and all studies assessing the effects of gene-based therapy on patients with SMA types 1 and 2 were included. The outcomes measured were survival, the need for ventilatory support, improvements in motor function, and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. A total of 57 studies (n = 3418) were included, and the meta-analyses revealed that onasemnogene abeparvovec showed the highest survival rate (95% [95% CI: 88, 100]), followed by risdiplam (86% [95% CI: 76, 94]) and nusinersen (60% [95% CI: 50, 70]). The number of patients needing ventilatory support was reduced after treatment with onasemnogene abeparvovec (risk ratio = 0·10 [95% CI: 0·02, 0·53]). Onasemnogene abeparvovec and risdiplam had similar proportions of patients with improvements in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders score of ≥4 points (92% [95% CI: 62, 100] vs 90% [95% CI: 77, 97]). In contrast, nusinersen had the smallest improvement (74% [95% CI: 66, 81]). The most frequently observed adverse drug reactions were headaches, vomiting, and gastrointestinal disorders. Gene-based therapy benefits patient survival and improves motor function. Onasemnogene abeparvovec and risdiplam appear highly effective, whereas nusinersen exhibits moderate effectiveness.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyMuscular Atrophy, SpinalSpinal Muscular Atrophies of ChildhoodAptamers, NucleotideAzo CompoundsBiological ProductsHumansOligonucleotidesPyrimidinesTreatment OutcomeAptamers, NucleotideAzo CompoundsBiological ProductsnusinersenOligonucleotidesPyrimidinesRisdiplam

Identifiers

PMID39604484
PMCPMC12310513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.