ArticleScientific reports2024
Predicting executive functioning from walking features in Parkinson's disease using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motor-Derived Digital Biomarkers for Identifying Low-MoCA Status in People with Parkinson's Disease.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Obstacle Circumvention and Motor Daily Dual Task During a Simulation of Street Crossing by Individuals with Parkinson's Disease.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Observational
- Relationship between executive function and dual-task walking in people with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease is characterized by motor and cognitive deficits. While previous work suggests a relationship between both, direct empirical evidence is scarce or inconclusive. Therefore, we examined the relationship between walking features and executive functioning in patients with Parkinson's disease using state-of-the-art machine learning approaches. A dataset of 103 geriatric Parkinson inpatients, who performed four walking conditions with varying difficulty levels depending on single task walking and additional motor and cognitive demands, was analyzed. Walking features were quantified using an inertial measurement unit (IMU) system positioned at the patient's lower back. The analyses included five imputation methods and four regression approaches to predict executive functioning, as measured using the Trail-Making Test (TMT). Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) in combination with support vector regression (SVR) reduce the mean absolute error by about 4.95% compared to baseline. Importantly, predictions solely based on walking features obtained with support vector regression mildly but significantly correlated with Δ-TMT values. Specifically, this effect was primarily driven by step time variability, double limb support time variability, and gait speed in the dual task condition with cognitive demands. Taken together, our data provide direct evidence for a link between executive functioning and specific walking features in Parkinson's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.