Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39604482›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

Daodong Chen, Tao Liu, Kunyang Du, Zhenjun Zhu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daodong ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Xinxiang Central Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University, 56 Jinsui Avenue, Xinxiang, 453000, Henan, China.
Tao LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Xinxiang Central Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University, 56 Jinsui Avenue, Xinxiang, 453000, Henan, China.
Kunyang DuDepartment of Orthopedics, Xinxiang Central Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University, 56 Jinsui Avenue, Xinxiang, 453000, Henan, China.
Zhenjun ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, Xinxiang Central Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University, 56 Jinsui Avenue, Xinxiang, 453000, Henan, China. hnxxzxyyz@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) often necessitates surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) are two commonly used techniques for treating LDH, each offering distinct surgical approaches. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of OLIF versus TLIF in terms of pain relief, functional outcomes, spinal alignment correction, fusion success, and postoperative recovery. A retrospective study was conducted on 133 patients who underwent either OLIF (n = 68) or TLIF (n = 65) between January 2020 and December 2022. Data on patient demographics, pain and functional outcomes (measured by Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), radiological outcomes (sagittal and coronal Cobb angles, apical vertebra deviation), fusion and collapse rates, and postoperative recovery (ambulation time and hospitalization duration) were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests and chi-square tests, with significance set at P < 0.05. Both groups demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in pain and functional outcomes. OLIF resulted in significantly better long-term pain reduction (VAS 1.99 ± 0.67 vs. 2.29 ± 0.92, P = 0.03) and greater spinal alignment correction, particularly in sagittal Cobb angle and apical vertebra deviation (P < 0.001). The fusion rate was similar between OLIF (97.92%) and TLIF (96.61%, P = 0.56), but OLIF had a lower collapse rate (8.33% vs. 18.64%, P < 0.001). OLIF also facilitated faster postoperative recovery, with earlier ambulation and shorter hospitalization time (P < 0.001 for both). While both OLIF and TLIF are effective for treating LDH, OLIF offers superior long-term pain relief, better spinal alignment correction, reduced collapse rates, and faster recovery. These findings suggest that OLIF may be a more advantageous option for patients requiring lumbar interbody fusion.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAfusion rateLumbar disc herniationOblique lateral Interbody FusionPostoperative recoveryTransforaminal lumbar Interbody Fusion

Identifiers

PMID39604482
PMCPMC11603332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.