ArticleScientific reports2024
The efficacy of topological properties of functional brain networks in identifying major depressive disorder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain functional network correlates and predictors of the perioperative antidepressant effect of esketamine in breast cancer patients: a double-blind randomized controlled trial using resting-state fMRI and graph theory.Translational psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Altered Functional Specialization and Interhemispheric Coordination in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Associations With Gene Expression, Neurotransmitter Receptor Distribution, and SVM-SHAP ClassificationCNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Construction of a depression risk prediction model for hepatitis B patients based on machine learning strategy.PloS one · 2026Article
- Altered Topology of Brain Structural Network in Patients With Migraine Without Aura: A Structural MRI Study.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Article
- Advancing the diagnosis of major depressive disorder: Integrating neuroimaging and machine learning.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a common mental disorder characterized by cognitive impairment, and its pathophysiology remains to be explored. In this study, we aimed to explore the efficacy of brain network topological properties (TPs) in identifying MDD patients, revealing variational brain regions with efficient TPs. Functional connectivity (FC) networks were constructed from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Small-worldness did not exhibit significant variations in MDD patients. Subsequently, two-sample t-tests were employed to screen FC and reconstruct the network. The discriminative ability of TPs between MDD patients and healthy controls was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC), ROC analysis showed the small-worldness of binary reconstructed FC network (p < 0.05) was reduced in MDD patients, with area under the curve (AUC) of local efficiency (Le) and clustering coefficient (Cp) as sample features having AUC of 0.6351 and 0.6347 respectively being optimal. The AUC of Le and Cp for retained brain regions by T-test (p < 0.05) were 0.6795 and 0.6956 respectively. Further, support vector machine (SVM) model assessed the effectiveness of TPs in identifying MDD patients, and it identified the Le and Cp in brain regions selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), with average accuracy from leave-one-site-out cross-validation being 62.03% and 61.44%. Additionally, shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was employed to elucidate variations in TPs across brain regions, revealing that predominant variations among MDD patients occurred within the default mode network. These results reveal efficient TPs that can provide empirical evidence for utilizing nodal TPs as effective inputs for deep learning on graph structures, contributing to understanding the pathological mechanisms of MDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.